Comparison of actionable events detected in cancer genomes by whole-genome sequencing, in silico whole-exome and mutation panels.

BACKGROUND: Next-generation sequencing is used in cancer research to identify somatic and germline mutations, which can predict sensitivity or resistance to therapies, and may be a useful tool to reveal drug repurposing opportunities between tumour types. Multigene panels are used in clinical practice for detecting targetable mutations. However, the value of clinical whole-exome sequencing (WES) and whole-genome sequencing (WGS) for cancer care is less defined, specifically as the majority of variants found using these technologies are of uncertain significance. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We used the Cancer Genome Interpreter and WGS in 726 tumours spanning 10 cancer types to identify drug repurposing opportunities. We compare the ability of WGS to detect actionable variants, tumour mutation burden (TMB) and microsatellite instability (MSI) by using in silico down-sampled data to mimic WES, a comprehensive sequencing panel and a hotspot mutation panel. RESULTS: We reveal drug repurposing opportunities as numerous biomarkers are shared across many solid tumour types. Comprehensive panels identify the majority of approved actionable mutations, with WGS detecting more candidate actionable mutations for biomarkers currently in clinical trials. Moreover, estimated values for TMB and MSI vary when calculated from WGS, WES and panel data, and are dependent on whether all mutations or only non-synonymous mutations were used. Our results suggest that TMB and MSI thresholds should not only be tumour-dependent, but also be sequencing platform-dependent. CONCLUSIONS: There is a large opportunity to repurpose cancer drugs, and these data suggest that comprehensive sequencing is an invaluable source of information to guide clinical decisions by facilitating precision medicine and may provide a wealth of information for future studies. Furthermore, the sequencing and analysis approach used to estimate TMB may have clinical implications if a hard threshold is used to indicate which patients may respond to immunotherapy.

ctDNA as a biomarker of progression in oesophageal adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of oesophageal adenocarcinoma (OAC) is rapidly increasing and despite improvements in treatment, the 5-year survival rate remains poor. Prognostic biomarkers that address the genomic heterogeneity in this highly complex disease will aid the development of precision therapeutics and improve patient survival. The aim of this study was to determine whether circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) has prognostic significance as a biomarker in OAC patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We profiled 209 blood and tumour samples from 57 OAC patients. Using a panel of 77 cancer genes, we sequenced ctDNA in plasma samples (n = 127) which were taken at multiple time points before and after therapy. In parallel, we sequenced matched tumour samples from 39 patients using the same gene panel. To assess whether the ctDNA profile reflected the tumour heterogeneity, we sequenced additional multi-region primary tumour samples in 17 patients. In addition, we analysed whole-genome and whole-exome sequencing data from primary tumours for a subset of 18 patients. RESULTS: Using a tumour-agnostic approach, we found that detectable ctDNA variants in post-treatment plasma samples were associated with worse disease-specific survival. To evaluate whether the ctDNA originated from the primary tumour, we carried out a tumour-informed analysis which confirmed post-treatment ctDNA variants were associated with worse survival. To determine whether ctDNA could be used as a clinical follow-up test, we assessed blood samples from multiple time points before and after treatment, in a subset of patients. Results showed that the variant allele frequency of ctDNA variants increased with disease recurrence. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that ctDNA variants can be detected in patients with OAC and this has potential clinical utility as a prognostic biomarker for survival.

Whole-genome sequencing reveals clinically relevant insights into the aetiology of familial breast cancers.

BACKGROUND: Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) is a powerful method for revealing the diversity and complexity of the somatic mutation burden of tumours. Here, we investigated the utility of tumour and matched germline WGS for understanding aetiology and treatment opportunities for high-risk individuals with familial breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We carried out WGS on 78 paired germline and tumour DNA samples from individuals carrying pathogenic variants in BRCA1 (n = 26) or BRCA2 (n = 22) or from non-carriers (non-BRCA1/2; n = 30). RESULTS: Matched germline/tumour WGS and somatic mutational signature analysis revealed patients with unreported, dual pathogenic germline variants in cancer risk genes (BRCA1/BRCA2; BRCA1/MUTYH). The strategy identified that 100% of tumours from BRCA1 carriers and 91% of tumours from BRCA2 carriers exhibited biallelic inactivation of the respective gene, together with somatic mutational signatures suggestive of a functional deficiency in homologous recombination. A set of non-BRCA1/2 tumours also had somatic signatures indicative of BRCA-deficiency, including tumours with BRCA1 promoter methylation, and tumours from carriers of a PALB2 pathogenic germline variant and a BRCA2 variant of uncertain significance. A subset of 13 non-BRCA1/2 tumours from early onset cases were BRCA-proficient, yet displayed complex clustered structural rearrangements associated with the amplification of oncogenes and pathogenic germline variants in TP53, ATM and CHEK2. CONCLUSIONS: Our study highlights the role that WGS of matched germline/tumour DNA and the somatic mutational signatures can play in the discovery of pathogenic germline variants and for providing supporting evidence for variant pathogenicity. WGS-derived signatures were more robust than germline status and other genomic predictors of homologous recombination deficiency, thus impacting the selection of platinum-based or PARP inhibitor therapy. In this first examination of non-BRCA1/2 tumours by WGS, we illustrate the considerable heterogeneity of these tumour genomes and highlight that complex genomic rearrangements may drive tumourigenesis in a subset of cases.

Analysis of Brca1-deficient mouse mammary glands reveals reciprocal regulation of Brca1 and c-kit.

Disruption of the breast cancer susceptibility gene Brca1 results in defective lobular-alveolar development in the mammary gland and a predisposition to breast tumourigenesis in humans and in mice. Recent evidence suggests that BRCA1 loss in humans is associated with an expansion of the luminal progenitor cell compartment in the normal breast and tumours with a luminal progenitor-like expression profile. To further investigate the role of BRCA1 in the mammary gland, we examined the consequences of Brca1 loss in mouse mammary epithelial cells in vitro and in vivo. Here, we show that Brca1 loss is associated with defective morphogenesis of SCp2 and HC11 mouse mammary epithelial cell lines and that in the MMTV-Cre Brca1(Co/Co) mouse model of Brca1 loss, there is an accumulation of luminal progenitor (CD61(+)CD29(lo)CD24(+)) cells during pregnancy. By day 1 of lactation, there are marked differences in the expression of 1379 genes, with most significantly altered pathways and networks, including lactation, the immune response and cancer. One of the most differentially expressed genes was the luminal progenitor marker, c-kit. Immunohistochemical analysis revealed that the increase in c-kit levels is associated with an increase in c-kit positivity. Interestingly, an inverse association between Brca1 and c-kit expression was also observed during mammary epithelial differentiation, and small interfering RNA-mediated knockdown of Brca1 resulted in a significant increase in c-kit mRNA levels. We found no evidence that c-kit plays a direct role in regulating differentiation of HC11 cells, suggesting that Brca1-mediated induction of c-kit probably contributes to Brca1-associated tumourigenesis via another cellular process, and that c-kit is likely to be a marker rather than a mediator of defective lobular-alveolar development resulting from Brca1 loss.